Category Archives: Obama administration

The conservative prophecy, self-fulfilled

Conservatives in general and Republicans in particular have chosen to bet the farm on the idea that government in and of itself is a bad thing. And every time they are voted into power, they do everything within their means to make that abstraction a reality.

Government is inefficient, they say, and then create odious budget deficits to prove their point.

Government cannot support itself, they say, and then explode the national debt to prove their point.

Government is bad for the economy, they say, and then destroy American jobs to prove their point.

For Chrissakes, they famously declared their intent to “drown government in a bathtub.” Why on earth would you ever choose them to run your government?

And yet we do. And are invariably surprised to reap the whirlwind.

In today’s New York Times, Paul Krugman illustrates how the BP oil spill exemplifies this phenomenon. The jury is still out on a comprehensive picture of the causes of the spill. But it’s clear even now that the destruction of common sense regulation during the Bush administration played a huge role.

[T]here is a common thread running through Katrina and the gulf spill — namely, the collapse in government competence and effectiveness that took place during the Bush years.

The full story of the Deepwater Horizon blowout is still emerging. But it’s already obvious both that BP failed to take adequate precautions, and that federal regulators made no effort to ensure that such precautions were taken.

For years, the Minerals Management Service, the arm of the Interior Department that oversees drilling in the gulf, minimized the environmental risks of drilling. It failed to require a backup shutdown system that is standard in much of the rest of the world, even though its own staff declared such a system necessary. It exempted many offshore drillers from the requirement that they file plans to deal with major oil spills. And it specifically allowed BP to drill Deepwater Horizon without a detailed environmental analysis.

Surely, however, none of this — except, possibly, that last exemption, granted early in the Obama administration — surprises anyone who followed the history of the Interior Department during the Bush years.

For the Bush administration was, to a large degree, run by and for the extractive industries — and I’m not just talking about Dick Cheney’s energy task force. Crucially, management of Interior was turned over to lobbyists, most notably J. Steven Griles, a coal-industry lobbyist who became deputy secretary and effectively ran the department. (In 2007 Mr. Griles pleaded guilty to lying to Congress about his ties to Jack Abramoff.)

Given this history, it’s not surprising that the Minerals Management Service became subservient to the oil industry — although what actually happened is almost too lurid to believe. According to reports by Interior’s inspector general, abuses at the agency went beyond undue influence: there was “a culture of substance abuse and promiscuity” — cocaine, sexual relationships with industry representatives, and more. Protecting the environment was presumably the last thing on these government employees’ minds.

In any case, now is the time to make that break — and I don’t just mean by cleaning house at the Minerals Management Service. What really needs to change is our whole attitude toward government. For the troubles at Interior weren’t unique: they were part of a broader pattern that includes the failure of banking regulation and the transformation of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, a much-admired organization during the Clinton years, into a cruel joke. And the common theme in all these stories is the degradation of effective government by antigovernment ideology.

Conservatives in general and Republicans in particular have no interest in the success of our government. Knowing that, we should never allow them to be in charge of it.

Never again.

Fuck the Republicans

No, really. Fuck ‘em.

Despite their protestations to the contrary, they are the single worst thing that’s ever happened to the American economy.

In addition to being the reigning champs at creating gargantuan budget deficits and exploding the national debt, they are also reprehensible job killers.

But don’t take my word for it. Try the Bureau of Labor Statistics:

The next time you hear a Republican use the term “fiscal responsibility,” try not to hurt yourself laughing.

Bad craziness in the Hinterlands

Now that two of the three branches of the Federal Government have fallen under the depraved spell of the New American Socialist Regime, it’s up to the states – and their spunky conservative residents – to take things into their own patriotic hands.

And boy have they ever.

Here’s a patriot’s grab-bag from the last couple of weeks:

Louisiana

While the elephant in the room is busy wading ashore, it’s good to see my home state is still able to conduct business as usual:

Persons who have have been qualified to carry concealed weapons should be able to keep them strapped on in a church or temple as a way to enhance security, a House committee said today.

The Committee on the Administration of Criminal Justice voted 8-3 for House Bill 68 by Rep. Henry Burns, R-Shreveport, sending it to more debate on the House floor.

Praise god and pass the ammunition.

Oh, and side note? Even Fox News is now calling bullshit on the Obama-acted-slowly-on-the-oil-spill-so-it’s-just-like-Katrina meme. So I think it’s safe for the rest of us to drop it now, too. That didn’t take long.

Tennessee

…and no, the Nashville flood wasn’t his Katrina either.

In other Tennessee news:

Right-wing extremists who question the legitimacy of Barack Obama’s presidency tried to take on local law enforcement recently — and they seem to have come out on the losing end.

First, a Tennessee man was arrested after walking into his local county courthouse to try to effect a citizen’s arrest of a grand jury foreman who had refused to investigate President Obama’s legitimacy to serve — an encounter partially caught on video. That enraged one Georgia-based member of the far-right OathKeepers group. Responding to a call from an extremist leader, he drove to Tennessee with an AK-47 in a bid to get his comrade released — only to wind up getting arrested himself.

Luckily these “citizen’s” [sic] are working “in mass” [sic]. Otherwise you might mistake them for yokels who’ve never actually read the Constitution and, I dunno, arrest them or something.

Ohio

Samuel Joe the Plumber wins a seat on his county’s Republican committee.

Oklahoma

It’s official: it’s now illegal to be a woman in Oklahoma.

The Oklahoma Legislature voted Tuesday to override the governor’s vetoes of two abortion measures, one of which requires women to undergo an ultrasound and listen to a detailed description of the fetus before getting an abortion.

Though other states have passed similar measures requiring women to have ultrasounds, Oklahoma’s law goes further, mandating that a doctor or technician set up the monitor so the woman can see it and describe the heart, limbs and organs of the fetus. No exceptions are made for rape and incest victims.

A second measure passed into law on Tuesday prevents women who have had a disabled baby from suing a doctor for withholding information about birth defects while the child was in the womb [read: it's okay for doctors to not tell expectant mothers about birth defects if they think it would cause them to abort].

[Governor] Henry has signed two [other provisions] into law: a measure requiring clinics to post signs stating that a woman cannot be forced to have an abortion, and another making it illegal to have an abortion because of the sex of a child.

Two other anti-abortion bills are still working their way through the Legislature and are expected to pass. One would force women to fill out a lengthy questionnaire about their reasons for seeking an abortion; statistics based on the answers would then be posted online. The other restricts insurance coverage for the procedures.

Taken together, the various pieces of legislation would make Oklahoma one of the most prohibitive environments in the United States for women seeking to end a pregnancy, advocates for women and family planning said.

Virginia

Speaking of outlawing women, Virginia Attorney General and End Times warrior Ken Cuccinelli, not content with legalizing sexual profiling in his state, is now on a crusade to ban breasts from his DOJ:

Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli apparently isn’t fond of wardrobe malfunctions, even when Virginia’s state seal is involved.

The seal depicts the Roman goddess Virtus, or virtue, wearing a blue tunic draped over one shoulder, her left breast exposed. But on the new lapel pins Cuccinelli recently handed out to his staff, Virtus’ bosom is covered by an armored breastplate.

When the new design came up at a staff meeting, workers in attendance said Cuccinelli joked that it converts a risqué image into a PG one.

The joke might be on him, said University of Virginia political scientist Larry Sabato.
“When you ask to be ridiculed, it usually happens. And it will happen here, nationally,” he said. “This is classical art, for goodness’ sake.”

As turned off as he is by tits, though, it’s nothing compared to how he feels about science:

An investigation by Ken Cuccinelli of a climate scientist who was caught up in last year’s “Climate-Gate” flap is being likened to a “witch hunt” — even by global warming skeptics.

South Carolina

Thankfully, South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham is focusing on larger questions, such as what rights should be afforded to terrorist suspects:

There seems to be a strong sentiment in Congress that the only constitutional right suspected terrorists have is the right to bear arms.

“I think you’re going too far here,” said Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina at a hearing of the Senate Homeland Security Committee on Wednesday. He was speaking in opposition to a bill that would keep people on the F.B.I. terrorist watch list from buying guns and explosives.

Say what?

Yes, if you are on the terrorist watch list, the authorities can keep you from getting on a plane but not from purchasing an AK-47. This makes sense to Congress because, as Graham accurately pointed out, “when the founders sat down and wrote the Constitution, they didn’t consider flying.”

Graham wanted to make it clear that just because he doesn’t want to stop gun purchases by possible terrorists, that doesn’t mean he’s not tough on terror.

“I am all into national security. … I want to stop reading these guys their Miranda rights,” he said.

To sum up: right to remain silent not okay for terrorists; right to buy guns and explosives okay for terrorists.

And last but not least, Arizona

Oy. Where to begin?

The newly-minted Arizona Gestapo is already asking brown citizens for their papers:

A Valley man says he was pulled over Wednesday morning and questioned when he arrived at a weigh station for his commercial vehicle along Val Vista and the 202 freeway.

Abdon was told he did not have enough paperwork on him when he pulled into a weigh station to have his commercial truck checked. He provided his commercial driver’s license and a social security number but ended up handcuffed.

An agent called his wife and she had to leave work to drive home and grab other documents like his birth certificate.

Is it any surprise that one of the Republican State Senate backers of the bill subscribes to the twitter feeds of two white nationalist organizations?

Don Black is a Florida-based white supremacist who is banned from the UK for inciting hatred. Arizona State Senate Majority leader Chuck Gray—a proponent of the recent immigration bill—follows him, and another white power feed, on Twitter.

[The] Twitter account [of white nationalist organization Stormfront], and another neo-Nazi feed linked to it, are among 4,819 that Arizona State Senate Majority Leader Chuck Gray follows. Stormfront does not reciprocate, however—the group follows no one. Which means that Gray, or whoever is responsible for his Twitter account, sought out the racist organization specifically and decided its tweets were essential reading.

Knowing that, would it further surprise you to hear that the bill’s author is also really into white nationalism? From the New York Times:

The state senator who wrote the law, Russell Pearce, had long been considered a politically incorrect embarrassment by more moderate members of his party — often to the delight of his supporters. There was the time in 2007 when he appeared in a widely circulated photograph with a man who was a featured speaker at a neo-Nazi conference. (Mr. Pearce said later he did not know of the man’s affiliation with the group.)

In 2006, he came under fire for speaking admirably of a 1950s federal deportation program called Operation Wetback, and for sending an e-mail message to supporters that included an attachment — inadvertently, he said — from a white supremacist group.

The “papers, please” law is so popular among flyover conservatives that Arizona may find it’s started a trend. Minnesota wants it and Florida teabagger favorite Marco Rubio is all for it now that he’s realized he was pandering to the wrong constituency when he said he was against it.

Truly, Arizona is flying off a cliff on rollerskates and crapping its pants all the way down. But there’s a certain freedom in that kind of release, and once the shit starts flying it’s hard to get it back in the old bottle:

Just a week after signing the country’s toughest immigration bill into law, Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer now must decide whether to endorse another bill passed by her state legislature — one that outlaws ethnic-studies programs in public schools.

Just in case that doesn’t make school time trauma-free for Jim-Bob and Cindy-Lou, this ought to do the trick:

The Arizona Department of Education recently began telling school districts that teachers whose spoken English it deems to be heavily accented or ungrammatical must be removed from classes for students still learning English.

Does the list of unacceptable accents include “Inbred Redneck?”

Spill, Baby, Spill

After a week of national anxiety over an uncertain response to the largest oil spill in history, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar painted the picture in stark terms on Sunday:

“It potentially is catastrophic,” Salazar said on CNN’s “State of the Union” program. “I think we have to prepare for the worst.” Salazar said later in the program that “it is indeed a massive oil spill.”

“While there have been blowouts in the past, we have never seen anything that has been quite of this magnitude.”

“So our job is to keep the boot on the neck of” BP to ensure it meets its obligations, Salazar said.

Indeed, British Petroleum is legally responsible for the spill, caused when the blowout prevention measures on its oil rig Deep Horizon failed. And they will be responsible financially for the costs incurred by other agencies in responding to the accident.

But while BP is in first position of responsibility, the blame is not solely theirs. To begin with, while the jury’s still out, it looks like the response from the federal government was sluggish, due to the trust it put in BP’s initial – deeply flawed – assessment of the situation:

The Obama administration has publicly chastised BP America for its handling of the spreading oil gusher, yet a review of the response suggests it may be too simplistic to place all the blame for the unfolding environmental catastrophe on the oil company. The federal government also had opportunities to move more quickly, but did not do so while it waited for a resolution to the spreading spill from BP.

BP officials, even after the oil leak was confirmed by using remote-controlled robots, expressed confidence that the leak was slow enough, and steps taken out in the Gulf of Mexico aggressive enough, that the oil would never reach the coast.

Comparisons with George W Bush’s anemic response to hurricane Katrina are tempting. Even the shape of the black oil slick, seen above, seems to mimic the pinwheel shape of that hurricane as it heads straight towards New Orleans. But the differences are stark. While Katrina was a natural disaster, the BP spill was caused not only by an oil company, but by regulatory policies which failed to ensure that their safety measures were adequate. Following the blowout, the government largely took BP’s lead when it came to assessing both the cause and the prognosis. Not exactly a portrait of a robust regulatory environment.

Hopefully, the lessons learned will actually scare their way into legislation. There are early signs of the possibility:

[Mr. Obama] maintained that he continued to “believe that domestic oil production is an important part of our overall strategy for energy security,” addressing concerns about whether the administration would stick with its plan to increase drilling in the gulf.

But administration officials left open the possibility that they might reconsider the decision to expand offshore drilling if conditions in the gulf worsened. Mr. Gibbs said there would be “an extensive environmental review before deciding” on issuing new drilling leases.

A good first step, if it happens. The thing to keep an eye on, though, is whether new regulations regarding platform and drilling mechanism safety appear. If they don’t, the lesson will have been wasted.

And what does the anti-regulatory crowd have to say about the spill? Another ghost-written gem from Sarah Palin’s Facebook page:

We’ve all been shocked and saddened by the tragic events in the Gulf of Mexico. My heart breaks for coastal residents who are facing fears of the unknown impacts of the oil spill.

But it doesn’t break enough to actually want to do anything about it:

I repeat the slogan “drill here, drill now” not out of naiveté or disregard for the tragic consequences of oil spills – my family and my state and I know firsthand those consequences.

She knows firsthand, and as she says, “from the heart.” She just doesn’t give a fuck. Holding on to her best slogan for 2012 trumps whatever horrors await the Gulf Coast when that ever-growing oil slick touches down.

“Drill, baby, drill.”

Tuesday roundup

Poor Mitt Romney. He’s going to be reading ledes like this one every day between now and the day that he concedes the 2012 Republican primary race:

Mitt Romney on RomneyCare: The former Massachusetts governor talks about the subtle differences between his state’s health care reform and that signed by President Obama.

And Poor John McCain.

Yes, it’s still true: Republicans are despicable. Even to their own people.

Did you know that promiscuous women cause earthquakes?

I can’t think of a better argument for drug legalization than this one.

Lucy gets her football ready – again:

“I’m optimistic that maybe the Democrats won’t go forward with the [Financial Reform] bill as it is,” [Sen. Olympia] Snowe [R-Maine] told reporters outside her office. “Over the next few days, hopefully, something will change to make that possible. I don’t see why it would be impossible because frankly I think that there isn’t that much of a gap.”

Would such an agreement be possible within the week, to keep within the Democrats’ preferred timeframe?

“I think it certainly could be, absolutely,” Snowe said. “I’m always willing to be the only Republican if it’s the right thing, and it’s important to do the right thing on this.

As she’s said before, when history calls, history calls.

Governor Rick Perry (R-Texastan) thinks W was the Best. President. Evah.

At the end of the day, when the history books are written, I think George W. Bush will go down as a very, very good President. Approaching great? I don’t know yet because I don’t know if we’ve seen the –

A year and a half since he’s been out of office, this may be a little bit early to write George’s history. But here’s why he was an incredibly good President: because this man kept America safe. […]

Anyone who is not a rank political hack, who has an agenda, and looks at this President’s efforts — I mean, there are two things that I think people judge Presidents on: their safety and the economy.

No doubt. One of the most epic terrorist attacks in world history, a soaring deficit, and a near-economic collapse later, George’s posterity is sitting pretty.

Speaking of keeping America safe:

Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Maliki and US officials say two leaders of al-Qaeda in Iraq have been killed in a joint Iraqi-US operation.

Mr Maliki said on national TV that the Iraqi al-Qaeda leader Abu Ayyub al-Masri and Abu Omar al-Baghdadi, who led an affiliate group, were dead.

US Vice-President Joe Biden said their deaths were “potentially devastating blows” to al-Qaeda in Iraq.

You know – the “al-Qaeda in Iraq” that didn’t even exist until Rick Perry’s BFF invaded the country.

Ah, chastity:

When Pat Bond told her lover Henry Willenborg, a Franciscan priest, that she was pregnant, he urged her to have an abortion.

Bond, who was 28, had a miscarriage and then became pregnant again. This time Willenborg’s superiors urged her to give up the child for adoption.

Bond, from Missouri, kept the child but agreed to a vow of silence. In a signed contract with the Catholic Church, she undertook to keep the priest’s identity secret in exchange for financial support for her son, Nathan.

In America, Britain, Ireland, Germany, France, Italy and Austria,women made pregnant by priests have signed such pledges in exchange for hush money from the church.

Deus vult, and all that.

Looks like Jews for Sarah Palin may have launched their web site a little too soon:

Hearing any leader declare that America isn’t a Christian nation and poking at allies like Israel in the eye — it is mind-boggling to see some of our nation’s actions recently, but politics truly is a topic for another day,” Palin said.

In some ways the really noteworthy thing here is that Palin specifically combined her denunciation of religious minority groups with an attack on Barack Obama’s insufficient fealty to Israeli government policies. The two themes were in the very same sentence.

Jim Crow is alive and well in Arizona. Thanks to the Arizona legislature, having brown skin is the only probable cause police now need to pull you over and ask for your papers. Jawohl!

This is pretty much all you need to know about the Republicans’ loyalties when it comes to passing meaningful financial reform.

The Douchebag Council at Pat Robertson’s Liberty University argue that unless employers are allowed to discriminate on the basis of sexual preference, deviant sex offenders are going to rape the bloody stumps of paraplegic veterans.

For Mitch McConnell, telling lies is like breathing:

CANDY CROWLEY (CNN, Sunday): The president says you are being deceptive in describing this bill.

MCCONNELL: Well, Candy … there is a bailout fund in the bill that was reported out of the Banking Committee, the partisan bill that came out of committee on a party-line vote.

CROWLEY: But that still does not–

MCCONNELL: I don’t think that’s in dispute.

CROWLEY: But that bailout is funded by the banks themselves, is it not? It is not a taxpayer bailout?

MCCONNELL: Well, Robert Reich, who was Bill Clinton’s secretary of labor, says it is a bailout fund.

***

When Mitch McConnell has to misquote me to find evidence he’s telling the truth, he is desperate. No, Senator, I never said Dodd’s finance reform bill contains a bailout fund. The fund in the Dodd bill is a $50 billion liquidation fund designed to keep the creditors of distressed banks from jumping ship so fast they’d cause widespread financial panic before the bank’s operations could be wound down. And the cost of that liquidation fund would be paid entirely by Wall Street’s biggest banks. So it’s not, I repeat not, a bailout fund.

As always, Eugene Robinson nails it:

The overhyped Tea Party phenomenon is more about symbolism and screaming than anything else. A “movement” that encompasses gun nuts, tax protesters, devotees of the gold standard, Sarah Palin, insurance company lobbyists, “constitutionalists” who have not read the Constitution, Medicare recipients who oppose government-run health care, crazy “birthers” who claim President Obama was born in another country, a contingent of outright racists (come on, people, let’s be real) and a bunch of fat-cat professional politicians pretending to be “outsiders” is not a coherent intellectual or political force.

Speaking of the incoherence of the Tea People:

Tea party activists are divided roughly into two camps, according to a new POLITICO/TargetPoint poll: one that’s libertarian-minded and largely indifferent to hot-button values issues and another that’s culturally conservative and equally concerned about social and fiscal issues.

The results, however, suggest a distinct fault line that runs through the tea party activist base, characterized by two wings led by the politicians who ranked highest when respondents were asked who “best exemplifies the goals of the tea party movement” — former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin and Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas), a former GOP presidential candidate.

Call it the Dingbat/Wingnut split.

Finally, there is much to criticize about the Obama administration. Thinking that America’s success is measured by how much the rest of the world hates us is not one of them.

It’s time to honor their service

GetEQUAL is an equal rights advocacy group founded by Robin McGehee and Kip Williams, the co-directors of last Fall’s National Equality March on Washington. As part of their larger goal of demanding equal rights for the LGBT community, they have partnered with Lt. Dan Choi to carry out direct actions aimed at lighting a fire under the repeal of “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell.”

GetEQUAL’s first action took place on March 18th, when Dan Choi and fellow serviceman Capt. Jim Pietrangelo were arrested for handcuffing themselves to the White House gates and calling for President Obama to make good on his promise to repeal DADT. The display was coordinated with a sit-in at Nancy Pelosi’s office in San Francisco, where four GetEQUAL members were arrested while protesting Congress’ failure to pass the Employee Non-Discrimination Act.

In Robin and Kip’s own words:

Our mission at GetEQUAL is simple: to create a movement of everyday people—lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and straight—who are dedicated to bringing about full legal and social equality. We believe there are millions of Americans who are tired of waiting and are ready to act. Our goal is to serve and grow this constituency by helping them take strategic, coordinated, bold action to demand equality, and to hold accountable those who stand in the way.

We know it will take all of us working together to reach our goals, so we seek to create a broad and inclusive community. GetEQUAL will bring together people of every sex, gender, race, class, age, ability, look, religion, family status, or citizenship; those who can contribute in small ways, and those who are able to put themselves on the line. United, we can build a more powerful movement to demand change. We invite you to join us, and ask your friends and family to do the same.

Join with us.

Take bold action to demand equality for LGBTQ people. Don’t accept excuses, delays, compromises, or empty promises. Hold accountable any person or organization who stands in the way. Push back, rise up, and speak out against all forms of discrimination that plague our community.

Take the pledge.

Join the fight.

Help us make this one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

Let the games begin

Justice John Paul Stevens’ retirement announcement is less than a day old, and already the Party of No is lining up its objections to the imaginary nominee for his replacement, who has not yet even been announced.

Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL):

The product of [Sonya Sotomayor's] confirmation hearing was a near-universal rejection of President Obama’s empathy standard, the flawed notion that judges should allow personal feelings, political opinions, and social views to guide judicial decision-making.

I hope I will be able to support the individual selected by the president, as I have a majority of his judicial nominees. But, as I have said before, I cannot and will not vote for a nominee with a record that fails to demonstrate a commitment to the Constitution, the rule of law, and the oath of a judge.

Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX):

Our nation deserves a Supreme Court nominee who is committed to deciding cases impartially based on the law, not on personal politics, preferences, or what’s in the nominee’s ‘heart.’

Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY):

As we await the President’s nominee to replace Justice Stevens at the end of his term, Americans can expect Senate Republicans to make a sustained and vigorous case for judicial restraint and the fundamental importance of an even-handed reading of the law.

Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT):

As I have said for many years, someone who would be an activist judge, who would substitute their own views for what the law requires, is not qualified to serve on the federal bench.

Sen. John Kyl (R-AZ) – before Stevens even announced his retirement:

[Whether Republicans filibuster] will all depend on what kind of a person it is. I think the president should nominate a qualified person. I hope, however, he does not nominate an overly ideological person. That will be the test.

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA):

The Judiciary Committee will take the time needed to ensure that the President’s nominee will be true to the Constitution and apply the law, not personal politics, feelings or preferences.

Sen. Tom Coburn (R-C Street):

I hope President Obama’s pick will unite rather than divide the country (translation: I hope he picks a slavering wingnut).

The End Times network

Oy.

Dingbat smackdown

President Obama responds to Sarah Palin’s comments on the nuclear treaty he just signed with Russia:

Palin, the former vice presidential candidate, has not been shy about criticizing Obama’s policies and this week weighed in on his revamped nuclear strategy, saying it was like a child in a playground who says ‘punch me in the face, I’m not going to retaliate.’

“I really have no response to that. The last I checked, Sarah Palin is not much of an expert on nuclear issues,” Obama said in an interview with ABC News.

Pressed further on Republican criticism that his strategy restricts the use of nuclear weapons too much, Obama added:

“What I would say to them is, is that if the secretary of defense and the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff are comfortable with it, I’m probably going to take my advice from them and not from Sarah Palin.”

Booyah.

For those of you keeping score at home

U.S. job loss / growth per month, updated for March.

A Republican speaks his mind

Be honest and call in on the right line, folks.

Krugman on the debt

Following on from yesterday’s post regarding the makeup of U.S. budget deficits for the next ten years (recap: they’re almost 100% due to Republican policies), here’s a reasoned take on the way forward with regard to our national debt, courtesy of Paul Krugman in today’s NYT.

He makes two good points: 1) the national debt can be reduced much more easily than Republicans would have you believe, and 2) Democratic policies – specifically health care reform, defense cuts and the repeal of Republican tax cuts for the wealthy – are the best methods for doing so.

The Obama administration’s budget predicts that by 2020 we’ll have net federal debt of around 70% of GDP and a budget deficit of around 4 percent of GDP. Now, you don’t have to go to a zero budget deficit to make headway on the debt — a budget deficit of 2-3 percent of GDP would imply a steadily declining debt/GDP ratio. So if you believe the administration’s budget estimates, we’ll need to find another 1-2 percent of GDP in revenue or cost savings.

That’s not, in economic terms, a huge number. We could raise taxes that much and still be one of the lowest-tax nations in the advanced world. Or we could save a significant share of that total by not being totally prepared for the day when Soviet tanks sweep across the North German plain.

The only reason to doubt our ability to get things under control a decade from now is politics: if we’re still deadlocked, if sane Republicans are cowed by the Tea Party, then sure, we can have a fiscal crisis. And longer term, we’ll be in a mess unless we get health care costs under control — which is exactly what we’re trying to do, in the face of cries about death panels.

The numbers aren’t that bad; if we go wrong, the fault will lie not in our debt, but in ourselves.

How we got here: the Republican budget deficit

The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities recently published an analysis of U.S. budget deficits through the next decade, based largely upon CBO reporting. It’s worth having a look at it, because it illustrates very clearly which major budget components will be contributing to the deficit during that period.

Although the modern Svengali we call the GOP has mesmerized half the electorate into believing that Democratic programs like the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 and the Health Care Reform bill that just passed Congress make up for the majority of the deficit, even a cursory review of the attached graph guts that assumption like a dead fish. In fact, our projected budget deficits for the next decade break down pretty unflatteringly for our Republican friends:

Some critics charge that the new policies pursued by President Obama and the 111th Congress caused the huge federal budget deficits that the nation now faces. In fact, the tax cuts enacted under President George W. Bush, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and the economic downturn together explain virtually the entire deficit over the next ten years (see Figure 1).

If not for the tax cuts enacted during the presidency of George W. Bush that Congress did not pay for, the cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that were initiated during that period, and the effects of the worst economic slump since the Great Depression (including the cost of steps necessary to combat it), we would not be facing these huge deficits in the near term.
While President Obama inherited a dismal fiscal legacy, that does not diminish his responsibility to propose policies to address our fiscal imbalance and put the weight of his office behind them. Although policymakers should not tighten fiscal policy in the near term while the economy remains fragile, they and the nation at large must come to grips with the nation’s long-term deficit problem. But we should not mistake the causes of our predicament.

Make no mistake: President Obama owns this deficit now. Its implications were clear before he even began his presidential campaign. But if we ever hope to extract ourselves from our fiscal crisis, and ensure that it never happens again, we need to be clear about its causes, and be guided by them in the future.

Step 1: never voting Republicans back into office ever again.

Huge

Where was the Republican wall of resistance on this one? Another, smaller, but still historic bill is passed in the shadow of health care reform: student aid reform.

Specifically, a bill which kicks private banks out of the student loan market by creating a government agency which will distribute the government loans directly to students. Removing the profit-skimming middle man from the equation will plow back an estimated $36 billion into the Pell Grant program.

Win.

Booyah.

I’m proud to be a Hawkeye today.

Walking and chewing gum

Don’t miss this little tidbit amidst all the Health Care Reform headlines:

WASHINGTON — President Obama and his Russian counterpart, President Dmitri A. Medvedev, have broken through a logjam in their arms control negotiations and expect to sign a new treaty in Prague next month that would slash American and Russian nuclear arsenals, officials from both nations said Wednesday.

~snip~

The treaty would require each side to reduce deployed strategic nuclear warheads to roughly 1,600, down from 2,200 now, officials have said. It would also oblige each side to reduce its arsenal of strategic bombers and land- and sea-based missiles to 800, half the old limit of 1,600.

~snip~

Once this first treaty is done, the administration wants to open talks on further reductions in deployed strategic nuclear warheads, perhaps down to 1,000 each, as well as elimination of at least some of the thousands of strategic warheads currently in storage, and the thousands more tactical nuclear bombs that each side has.

If the two sides do finalize the treaty and sign it in Prague in early April, it would boost the momentum for the broader nuclear nonproliferation summit that Mr. Obama is scheduled to convene in Washington on April 12 and 13. The United States and Russia could go to that summit, and a later meeting on the nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, with tangible progress to show in meeting their disarmament goals.